IDempiere/FullMeeting20150318

From WikiQSS
Revision as of 19:45, 18 March 2015 by CarlosRuiz (talk | contribs) (full meeting)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

⇐ Table of Contents | Full Meeting Minutes | Full Meeting 2015-03-18

ocurieles: Good Morning guys
nmicoud: Hi
aguerra: hello everybody!!!!
Deepak_: Hello All
CarlosRuiz: Good Morning
nmicoud: Bonjour
aguerra: hello CarlosRuiz
Deepak_: Hello Carlos
Deepak_: Carlos, In pricelist, currently vendorbreak supports break per BPartner only
Deepak_: As BPartner is mandatory field
Deepak_: Do you know why qty break for all BPartner not supported?
CarlosRuiz: Deepak_, AFAIK not supported with price list break
Deepak_: See pricelist break work for a BPartner
Deepak_: But not for all BPartner by providing null BPartner
Deepak_: BPartner is mandatory field on price list break
octavian_: Hello. Is it possible to run process from model validator ?
Deepak_: CarlosRuiz, and following question is it good idea to make BPartner non mandatory and supporting qty break from price list break?
Deepak_: octavian, Yes it is possible
Deepak_: You can look at how InOutGen.generate method launch process
octavian_: Thank you
red1: Hello everyone..
red1: hi Hideaki
Hideaki: Hi red1
red1: Konnichiwa
Hideaki: Hello :D
tbayen: Daarestiet from Krefeld! :-)
aguerra: buenos dias red1
red1: buenos aires aguerra
CarlosRuiz: Hi Thomas / Hi Alejandro
hieplq: hi CarlosRuiz, i and nmicoud test IDEMPIERE-2244 and see some issue, also fixed it. please help me review it.
CarlosRuiz: ok hieplq - testing
Deepak_: Sorry may my session got Zombie
Deepak_: CarlosRuiz, and following question is it good idea to make BPartner non mandatory and supporting qty break from price list break?
Deepak_: If you answered above question, please repost
Deepak_: As I can't see
CarlosRuiz: Deepak, for me sounds like a good idea - maybe check in forums what others think
Deepak_: ohk
Deepak_: We already started work on same
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] ocurieles updated IDEMPIERE-1604 description set to "Extend the features on Window Customization / Tab Customization * Add Displayed Yes/No * Display Logic * Sequence * Where and Order By * Tab Customization "
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1604
tbayen: Hi all! We think about an extension of the login. We want to allow authentication through BasicAuth and through client certificates. If anyone is interested we can discuss that.
CarlosRuiz: Hi tbayen sounds interesting
CarlosRuiz: I saw something on Chuck's side about connecting BasicAuth with AD_User - but don't know the details
CarlosRuiz: Another topic that I see interesting would be to authenticate using google apps
CarlosRuiz: I was wondering about that - and I think it can be good to make the "authenticator" pluggable
CarlosRuiz: and maybe the LDAP implementation on idempiere would be moved as a plugin
tbayen: One of the ideas is to install a client certificate on an phone and give the user access without a need to give him a password. You can allow access to a single device (not a user).
CarlosRuiz: but - in my research it didn't see as an easy task - there are several services to authenticate and manage things in different ways
CarlosRuiz: if we make the authentication pluggable - then you can have a plugin that checks the certificate and correlates it with a user
CarlosRuiz: or maybe the certificate brings the user information within and you just need to move ahead in the login process as authenticated
CarlosRuiz: I think if we isolate the LDAP implementation to be a plugin (in beta status) we could evolve the plugin interface to cope with other authentication services
CarlosRuiz: tbayen, there was also something tricky in the research I made for multi-tenant environments
tbayen: My idea was that the certificate is checked by an apache proxy. It adds a new header that contains the user name.
CarlosRuiz: if different tenants wants different authentication services - then you would need a way to identify the tenant on the login page
tbayen: Then my idea was that the standard login process can use that header information to automatically fill the user and password field.
CarlosRuiz: not password - just user - and a way to know that the user was authenticated with the certificate
tbayen: Yes, that was the idea.
tbayen: I hope with a right proxy configuration I can guarantee that the header is guaranteed to be only there when the user is authenticated. So the pure existence of the header is like having a password.
hieplq: please investigate, we can rewrite login module with http://shiro.apache.org/
CarlosRuiz: hieplq, that looks great
CarlosRuiz: at the moment we have two ways of authentication - ad_user and LDAP - seems like shiro can make it pluggable
hieplq: seem shiro is skeleton, but it's good design for pluggable other authenticate method
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1604
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Maybe AD_Tab.AD_Process_ID can be also a good candidate to customize for tenant.
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1604
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1604 Fix Version set to "None"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1604
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1604
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] tip: I think the change is just on class GridTabVO.loadTabDetails Also, IsSingleRow and IsReadOnly must be changed to be Yes/No list instead of a checkbox - to allow nulls and change the code accordingly to check for null there. Also I see in the GridTabVO code the IsReadOnly is not being used And I think the Multi Row Only can be hidden as is not used.
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1604
tbayen: My thought was that the apache authentication is used by very many people and is very stable. And apache can use many different auth modules too. I have a greater trust to apache.
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2244 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-2244_fordev.patch"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Thanks [~hieplq], first patch I was able to integrate successfully, but second failed. I'm attaching for you review a patch called IDEMPIERE-2244_fordev.patch. Minor fixes there: - the names of the migration scripts were wrong - must be yyyymmddhhmm - there was an update to c_acctprocessor in the script which I deleted - the patch for VM_ARGUMENTS didn't apply on second patch - please check if this patch do what you wanted there - also, I
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2244
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2516 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-2516_add.patch"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] [~nmicoud], there is still a case (tested) if GardenWorld set the SYSTEM_IN_MAINTENANCE_MODE=N and System set SYSTEM_IN_MAINTENANCE_MODE=Y in this case GardenUser still can login. The attached patch IDEMPIERE-2516_add.patch solves that - I think it would be required to complete your approach - WDYT?
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2516
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2516
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Yes, i haven't though of this possibility, but in this case the System value must override the tenant value. Thanks ! Nicolas
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2516
norbertbede: hi all
CarlosRuiz: Hi norbertbede
hieplq_: hi CarlosRuiz, i will test IDEMPIERE-2244 when i has strong network. wdyt about IDEMPIERE-2523?
CarlosRuiz: hieplq, if you and nmicoud tell me that 2244 is ready I can integrate it / so, please make your tests thorough :)
CarlosRuiz: ah 2523 - :DDD the lazy patch
norbertbede: in interesting issue we found - related to peformance
hieplq__: sure, next day i will test script, and material to sure parameter update to eclipse
norbertbede: we have locally PG91 on amazon 93 same task tooks locally 3 sec on amazon 90 sec
norbertbede: we found a difference setup - parameter - enable_material
norbertbede: this was locally disabled on server 93 enabled
norbertbede: lot discussion arounds
norbertbede: will test night change parameter
norbertbede: any experience ?
norbertbede: more info: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/runtime-config-query.html
CarlosRuiz: nope - not experience with that parameter here
norbertbede: your setup is true or false, maybe just for curious
CarlosRuiz: it says there the default is on
CarlosRuiz: let me check - I haven't touched defaults
norbertbede: sure. thanks
norbertbede: suggest this tool http://explain.depesz.com/ for everybody
norbertbede: for analysing queries
CarlosRuiz: in my postgresql - checked with "show all" command
CarlosRuiz: is not showing any value for enable_material
CarlosRuiz: not in 8.4 neither in 9.4
norbertbede: this "explain" us materialisation tooks on server 1. 0sec from query time AND second server 47% from query time
norbertbede: strange
norbertbede: but thanks. i will share our experiences with that
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] tsvikruha updated IDEMPIERE-2437
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] I will attach next patch after changing it into Preference Dialog - seems it logical... Currently I am wondering of usability this theme concept per Client. Thats mean login page will have some general UI loaded from default theme defined in system config. After successful login, default theme for client will be loaded (theme which is defined in AD_Theme with IsDefault=Y). I've just tested this use case and looks like it is on a good way.
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2437
norbertbede: CarlosRuiz, @tomassvikruha update our favorite topic :) theme "Make iDempiere themes definable on different levels"
norbertbede: we move forward 1 step
norbertbede: means we want to find out how we can switch client theme when login
norbertbede: tomas made some java early stage classes but he describe our problem
norbertbede: would be helpful if you can advice Tomas direction
norbertbede: thanks well
norbertbede: we are online now both so can interact if required
CarlosRuiz: thanks norbertbede / tomassvikruha - I was struggling here with an eclipse issue
CarlosRuiz: I don't know about the resources not refreshed - sounds like some cached resources issue
CarlosRuiz: but on the issue about login page with a default system-wide theme
CarlosRuiz: in several tickets we've found the need to have a way to identify a tenant from the login page
CarlosRuiz: maybe something like http://url/webui?AD_Client_ID=1000000 could make the trick
tomassvikruha: Maybe its related to cached resource, or login page is loaded with header css styles, and after login only body of page is changes…WDYT? Because when I inspect page in chrome there was still linked old css styles
CarlosRuiz: I think if you push F5 it will reload the correct
norbertbede: can be this forced by login without F5 ?
norbertbede: by code i mean
tomassvikruha: yes, F5 will reload browser page
tomassvikruha: after it is everything correct
Not-311d: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±3] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-311d: [iDempiere] globalqss 033c01e - IDEMPIERE-2516 iDempiere monitor shows inactive clients (maintenance mode / active sessions) / thanks to Nicolas Micoud (nmicoud)
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2516 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Nicolas Micoud" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2516
CarlosRuiz: don't know if that refresh can be forced programatically
norbertbede: ok thanks well we will try again with hieplq
norbertbede: to sort out
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2523 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-2523_alt.patch"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] [~hieplq], I reviewed the patch and I think the modification to MSysConfig is not needed, uploading a patch IDEMPIERE-2523_alt.patch suggesting using Query to get the MSysConfig object. Now, instead of this patch I think it can be worthy to work on making WPreference extensible (or pluggable). I think this is one of the things that every implementation would like to add their own preferences for users. WDYT?
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2523
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2298 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Thanks [~hahmed], I'm not integrating this patch as r3 moved to jetty, but I think it deserves a wiki page explaining how to secure the default tomcat and pointing to the patch here - and explaining to change server.xml in a running server
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2298
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2298 labels set to "Security"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2298
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2298 Version set to "2.1"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2298
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2361
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Yes, sounds like Env.getURL maybe can do the trick as you point here - using the sysconfig key we can put it anywhere, not based on zkwebui
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2361
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2389
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Thanks [~hieplq] Some things noticed in the peer review: - script 201502041515_IDEMPIERE-2389 on postgresql has an additional insert into ad_element than the oracle version - script 201502161604_IDEMPIERE-2389 has wrong register filename on postgresql, and it has a sysconfig update for the developer password leaked - script 201513031604-IDEMPIERE-2389 has wrong name - the format must be yyyymmddhhmm - serialVersionUID of ProcessInfo chang
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2389
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] tsvikruha updated IDEMPIERE-2478
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Hi @Hiep, after merging last version I noticed that this patch produces one bug. Busy Dialog is not opened when process is fired from Info Window. Process runs without busy dialog - that is very strange for users. Can you reproduce it?
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2478
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] tsvikruha updated IDEMPIERE-2478
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] Hi [~hieplq], after merging last version I noticed that this patch produces one bug. Busy Dialog is not opened when process is fired from Info Window. Process runs without busy dialog - that is very strange for users. Can you reproduce it?
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2478
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] tsvikruha updated IDEMPIERE-2478 status set to "Reopened" -resolution set to "None"
Not-311d: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2478

Retrieved from "https://globalqss.com/wiki/index.php?title=IDempiere/FullMeeting20150318&oldid=508"