IDempiere/FullMeeting20150304

From WikiQSS
Revision as of 20:31, 4 March 2015 by CarlosRuiz (talk | contribs) (full meeting)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

⇐ Table of Contents | Full Meeting Minutes | Full Meeting 2015-03-04

CarlosRuiz: Good Morning
nmicoud: Bonjour
Deepak: Good Morning
red1: Hi all.. hi CarlosRuiz wana ask you about when will the 3.0 becomes default?
red1: i see its Jetty framework is a big j
red1: ump
red1: i wonder if what i posted is true https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2461
CarlosRuiz: I've seen the cyclic dependency before but never traced the cause - maybe you got it - is it reproducible?
CarlosRuiz: about 3.0 - I'm planning to maintain 2.1 for a while - but anybody can make 3.0 their default - I think norbertbede already did for him
red1: well it only happens during export of a plugin that depends in adempiere.base
red1: and the Jasper.Library has unused dependencies
CarlosRuiz: it doesn't happen here - just export iuimobile successfully
red1: easily resolved by just going to its MANIFEST editor in Eclipse and press that in 'Dependency Analysis'
red1: after accepting the list removal, export works
red1: it affects all plugins i am working on
CarlosRuiz: but I'm sure I've seen the error sometimes - with my LCO - not exporting - but compiling - and I need to do a refresh and full build to clear that - seems more like some eclipse issue
red1: yes i believe you because the cycle is illogical - base depends on jasper.lib depends on base again
red1: anyway i have never encountered heap size error again with the new jetty
ocurieles: Hi guys... .
ocurieles: @red1 you are welcome again :D
red1: and my Macbook has no more old issues of not able to launch Java client from Eclipse
CarlosRuiz: but norbertbede is reporting still issue with 3.0 - hard issues - so, I appreciate the big effort from norbertbede and his team to stabilize it
CarlosRuiz: Hi Orlando
red1: Hi Orlando
ocurieles: HI @CarlosRuiz
ocurieles: congrats to @JanThielemann for the New Asterisk plugin, is working fine :D
ocurieles: the next steep is integrate a softphone on IDempiere directly
JanThielemann: the question is if you really want to do this
ocurieles: maybe not
JanThielemann: when you time out you can't receive calls :/
ocurieles: mmm but is the same with the phone :D
JanThielemann: i think it's better to use ip-phone or softphone on os level
JanThielemann: this way you will always get the calls and if you are logged in in idempiere you can benefit from the call popup
ocurieles: yeah for compatibility is better
red1: Hi JanThielemann i be in Austria next month and i hope somehow i get to come to bring my son to see you
red1: actually my better question should be 'CarlosRuiz, when will you merge the 2.1 daily changes to 3.0?'
CarlosRuiz: I do it periodically
red1: to weed out new bugs
CarlosRuiz: https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/branches
JanThielemann: i'll be in dubai from 04.04-05.04, bangkok from 06.04-11.04 and then i'll be in australia for one year
ocurieles: @red1 what about the Anual World Conference of IDempiere?? :D
hieplq: hi @CarlosRuiz and @Deepak, IDEMPIERE-2389 and IDEMPIERE-1882 is same, diffirence is language combobox. wdyt about add language
hieplq: i will like to add language to patch of IDEMPIERE-2389.
CarlosRuiz: same goal with different approach?
hieplq: goal is difference in language combobox.
Deepak: I do not think language cobobox is good idea for all, if want to add,should be configurable
hieplq: i think patch of IDEMPIERE-2389 is complete than (because has save last choose )
hieplq: so, add language with a configuration?
Deepak: Yes, may system preference, default should not show
CarlosRuiz: and must not show if the tenant doesn't manage multi-language docs
CarlosRuiz: tbayen, AYT?
Deepak: Yes, Carlos. My goal is that
CarlosRuiz: so, hieplq have you analyzed both and you prefer 2389?
Deepak: So that need to enable when client managing multi language doc
hieplq: yes. i want base 2389 because it has save last choose.
CarlosRuiz: thanks hieplq for your tests and feedback
red1: ocurieles: maybe u ask tbayen about organising the conference :D
red1: since hieplq and me likely around Europe
nmicoud: oui, c'est ça ; ici 761 = telephone profesionnel
nmicoud: oops, wrong window, sorry
hieplq: @CarlosRuiz, also want finish IDEMPIERE-1974, because please confirm it's ok to bring 2389 to dialog parameter?
red1: OK JanThielemann where in Australia? Its nearer Malaysia too.
hieplq: @red1, i lile around of world not only europe :D
ocurieles: hhahaa @red1 maybe @hieplq need come to Colombia :D
JanThielemann: red1 traveling the east coast from sydney to cairns, then fly to perth and travel to melbourne.
ocurieles: @red1 you are the leader of the community.. you need do it...
JanThielemann: after the year i'm also in singapur for some days ;P
red1: i will fly to Melbourne later half of the year if u there, or Sydney, and in Melbourne we can be close to Adaxa team
CarlosRuiz: yes hieplq - I think 1974 would be great to add
Deepak: Any one know why inventory valuation report is only works with standard cost?
JanThielemann: bad design
Deepak: It has check, if no standard cost configured, then returning blank
CarlosRuiz: AFAIR it works with standard plus another cost
Deepak: If standard cost presents, it work
CarlosRuiz: :-( wiki is down so I can't see the Manual
red1: you can try my http://red1.org/DocBook :D
CarlosRuiz: thanks red1 - that helped
red1: http://red1.org/DocBook/InventoryValuationReportRpt.html
Deepak: It uses accounting schema cost, but there is check for standard cost
CarlosRuiz: maybe you can try commenting out the lines 117 and 118 on InventoryValue
CarlosRuiz: I think is a bug to force std cost to make it work
egil0902: Good morning to everyone.
red1: Another good contributor from Venezuela :D egil0902
CarlosRuiz: Hi Eduardo
red1: thanks so much egil0902 for what you done to iuiMobile
egil0902: Hi Carlos
egil0902: thanks red1
jzahri: Hello idempierians
CarlosRuiz: Hi jzahri
aguerra: hi people, good morning!
jzahri: Dont mind me here just hanging around
red1: Hola aguerra
aguerra: hi, Carlos, egil
CarlosRuiz: One more from Venezuela :-) Hi Alejandro
jzahri: Hi Carlos
aguerra: hi red1
aguerra: :-) (y)
Deepak: Thanks Eduardo
red1: it seems the good citizens of Venezuela left the govt to join iDempiere. :D
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] hieplq updated IDEMPIERE-2420
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] correct description for this issue is ignore unnecessary comet request. i notify, this issue is also exits in 2.1, because value of maxParameterCount = 10000 (default) http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/http.html it don't make sense with mid report.
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2420
red1: welcome jzahri where from?
jzahri: Hi red1
jzahri: Im from indo
egil0902: hi aguerra
jzahri: has any body tried using webdriver to qa idempiere before?
red1: ok ..seberang ya pak? Pekan mana?
jzahri: ya hehe..dr jakarta cikgu
jzahri: :D
red1: tim Edwin ya?
jzahri: bukan2 cik..freelance hehe
red1: so have you tried webdriver to test anything?
jzahri: yes2
jzahri: i've been using it on my company's projects
jzahri: i am planning to do the same on idempiere, but was wondering if any1 else has done before
red1: it be great if you can give some feedback on using it with iDempiere
red1: u can ask in the google group forum as many ppl read those
jzahri: ok will do
red1: if not u be the first
jzahri: my pleasure.. but the pace will be slow..so not seting up for high expectations ..hehe..
red1: its worth your while to be the first :)
red1: then you can harvest the results at an easy pace
jzahri: wish me luck :D
egil0902: Comunity i have and unspected behavior in process parallel execution
egil0902: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/idempiere/-5xozoGCrI0
egil0902: Here is the case. I would like you to review this
red1: egil0902: did you test for trxName in your process?
egil0902: Yes
egil0902: it was the first
egil0902: it was all nul and i correct it
egil0902: *null
red1: good
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1882 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-1882_updated.patch"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Hi, tested the patch attached here (I'm attaching the updated patch - changed the date of the script and added the missing registration at the end, and also some minor missing pieces on java). My comments about: * The WDateRange looks great! * in my tests Quartal is not working * Job is just exporting PDF * The advanced preferences are not saved * Language box and parameter must not be shown if the client is not multi lingual doc (like Ga
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1882
CarlosRuiz: hieplq, AYT?
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1882
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Hi, tested this patch and compared with IDEMPIERE-2389 approach. This patch works great as it does almost the same effect but additionally it saves the preferences. But I think the approach to show the advanced parameters is better (like implemented in IDEMPIERE-2389) - instead of showing them on the botton line - I tested this with a low resolution (like those in tablets) and the botton parameters became useless. Also, the WDateRange fro
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1882
hieplq: yes. i'm here
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2389
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Hi, tested the patch attached here (I'm attaching the updated patch - changed the date of the script and added the missing registration at the end, and also some minor missing pieces on java). My comments about: * The WDateRange looks great! * in my tests Quartal is not working * Job is just exporting PDF * The advanced preferences are not saved * Language box and parameter must not be shown if the client is not multi lingual doc (like Ga
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2389
CarlosRuiz: made comments on both tickets
hieplq: yes. reading, about layout need improve, when you resize sometime button is hidden
hieplq: i will do layout with 1974
CarlosRuiz: too many tickets :-)
CarlosRuiz: better let's do it one at a time
CarlosRuiz: I mean - the tickets mix and then is really hard to integrate all of them
CarlosRuiz: I'm confused in my comments about the two tickets - will try to fix
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1882
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Hi, tested the patch attached here (I'm attaching the updated patch - changed the date of the script and added the missing registration at the end, and also some minor missing pieces on java). My comments about: * The WDateRange looks great! * in my tests Quartal is not working * Job is just exporting PDF * The advanced preferences are not saved * Language box and parameter must not be shown if the client is not multi lingual doc (like Ga
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1882
hieplq: because i like you commit IDEMPIERE-2389 before i start 1974, anything remain with 2389 will do with 1974
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2389
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Hi, tested this patch and compared with IDEMPIERE-1882 approach. This patch works great as it does almost the same effect but additionally it saves the preferences. But I think the approach to show the advanced parameters is better (like implemented in IDEMPIERE-1882) - instead of showing them on the botton line - I tested this with a low resolution (like those in tablets) and the botton parameters became useless. Also, the WDateRange fro
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2389
CarlosRuiz: yes - I would like to commit 2389 but with the parameter disposition after the report parameters - is that hard?
hieplq: maybe add line above button line for new advance thing
CarlosRuiz: yes - that sounds good too - to separate
hieplq: let layout to 1974, will refine it.
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-591 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-591
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-591 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Incomplete"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-591
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-612 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI exchangeable extension icon icons images tree webui zk6"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-612
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-612 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Incomplete"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-612
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-622 labels set to "+Patch Potential-Idea SwingUI webui"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-622
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-622 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-622
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-628 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-628
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-628 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Incomplete"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-628
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-631 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Cannot Reproduce"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Cannot reproduce in actual development
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-631
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] [~nmicoud], I think this is a great idea to be implemented as a plugin with a toolbar button - is it possible?
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-799 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-799
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-799 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-799
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1061 labels set to "+Patch Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1061
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1061 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1061
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1092 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1092
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1097 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1097
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1097 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1097
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1572 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1572
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1634 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1634
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1634 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1634
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1661 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1661
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1661 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1661
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1870 labels set to "+Patch Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1870
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1870 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Won't Fix"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1870
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2107 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2107
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2107 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea - closing because of lack of community interest
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2107
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2360 labels set to "Potential-Idea SwingUI webui"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2360
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2360 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Incomplete"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Labeled as Potential Idea
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2360
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1171 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Duplicate"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1171
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1154 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] If I understood correctly this idea to show info on the right panel was implemented also on IDEMPIERE-1150
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1154
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2494 labels set to "+Patch"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2494
norbertbede: hi idempierans
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2495 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Cannot Reproduce"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] [~muriloht] - tested and the MStorageReservation.getQtyAvailable count all the products when the ASI is not set, so the patch is not necessary
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2495
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Yes, it would be possible to do it as a plugin... But, it would require 2 things : #1 : ability to change the image of the button (there is one image when there is a post it for the record, and another one when there is no post it ; same as attachment) #2 : when deleting the record, it should also delete the post it (in my code, look at PO_Record) Would it be possible to make those changes in core ? Nicolas
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2309
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Norbert I like those images better - but the release number of iDempiere must not be burnt into the image or we would need to change it on every release. Also, is it possible to contribute that as a patch from org.adempiere.server/resources folder. Another thing that we wanted to change is the icon for Send Request as is just the same of Webstore but inverted and that seems confusing. Regards, Carlos Ruiz
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2309
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2309
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Ah, BTW I think Try Demo is not good idea - better the Go To Login
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2309
CarlosRuiz: Hi norbertbede
norbertbede: looks we are alone here :)
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] deepak updated IDEMPIERE-2389
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Sure, Carlos will do same.
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2389
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede updated IDEMPIERE-2309
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] all headers version could be dynamic. so you succest to prepare patch incl. css etc.
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2309
norbertbede: CarlosRuiz. im sitting here with a designer and html/css geek. making some our internal theme.
norbertbede: they suggest me to change some tables change to dics
norbertbede: divs
norbertbede: e.g. favirorites gadget was created some years ago. opposite to Recent items
norbertbede: would give us better formatting and little performance
norbertbede: wdyt ?
CarlosRuiz: not my area of expertise - so I can trust if he's the expert :-)
norbertbede: so if we make better div implementation and will works are we ready to commit to v3 ?
CarlosRuiz: yep
hieplq: @norbertbede. idempiere base on zk. some zk control is render as table (gird, list, box)
hieplq: div always bestter but some time you can't switch
norbertbede: sure. but not possible to change zk elements ?
norbertbede: e.g. can we use in recent items and favorites instead table zk elements generates div ?
norbertbede: this could be right direction if possible
hieplq: somewhere you can easy change, somewhere hard to change
norbertbede: ok. going step by step
norbertbede: 1st . favorites
norbertbede: wdyt
norbertbede: ?
hieplq: example when you need a separate control, you must use box control other can you layout control
hieplq: layout is same div
norbertbede: favorites ? is which case ?
hieplq: wait me. my local has issue. i must go to demo :D
norbertbede: sure
hieplq: about left pannel, has no more complicate control, i can relayout it when has good design
hieplq: re-layout by zk control, i mean
hieplq: norbertbede, lucky. left panel hasn't table layout, only div
norbertbede: when :)
norbertbede: we see there tables now
norbertbede: content of favorites or recent items dashborad
norbertbede: can you send screenshot by skype
norbertbede: please go online :)
hieplq: yes. sorry i just see outter, but at this point can switch to div (layout control)
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Ah - I didn't notice it was that complex - let me check it better
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] deepak created IDEMPIERE-2500 Inventory valuation report do not work if Standard cost is not enabled
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2500
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] deepak updated IDEMPIERE-2500 assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-2500.patch"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Carlos, Please note that patch attached here.
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2500
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2496 Version set to "3.0"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2496
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2498 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Cannot Reproduce"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Tested in r2.1 and both Journals are marked as Reversed
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2498
Not-522e: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-522e: [iDempiere] dpansheriya 3690a74 - IDEMPIERE-2500 : Inventory valuation fail if there is no standard cost configured
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2500 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Deepak Pansheriya" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2500
red1: Sorry guys i slept early last night, i was not well. This morning after salt and water, i feel much better
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] [~nmicoud], #2 is easy, you can register a validator (AbstractEventHandler) like this: registerEvent(IEventTopics.PO_AFTER_DELETE); and do the delete on doHandleEvent #1 is a little harder, I think we need to extend the IAction interface (probably create a new one like IActionImage) The IActionImage interface would provide the execute method but also a method to determine if the botton is pushed or not (isButtonPushed) The Actions.getActi
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-905
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2492
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] [~jan.thielemann], if the user just have access to product 1000000 - and another user makes it private - then I think is correct to not show any record - is that the case or am I understanding wrong?
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2492
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss created IDEMPIERE-2501 Product Attribute displayed wrongly in formats and info window
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2501
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2501 Attachment set to "jira-capture-screenshot-20150304-182552-422.png"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2501
Not-522e: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 2 commits to release-2.1 [+2/-0/±3] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-522e: [iDempiere] tsvikruha da86ee1 - IDEMPIERE-1803 please change product attribute instance popup width
Not-522e: [iDempiere] globalqss 350e585 - IDEMPIERE-2501 Product Attribute displayed wrongly in formats and info window
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1803 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1803
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2501 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2501
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1017
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] [~jan.thielemann], I think the error is in the description of the field > The behavior is to open the query dialog window when the number of records on a table reach the "confirm query records" limit for the role.
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1017
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2489 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Cannot Reproduce"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Hi [~norbert.bede], I just tested in r2.1 with db and filesystem attachments, and also in r3 with db attachments, everything worked fine
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2489
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2486 priority set to "Blocker"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2486
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-868
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] Yes [~nmicoud], my point is that we must not have different name of objects in oracle and postgresql - so the name generated must be standard for both dbs if possible.
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-868
Not-522e: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 2 commits to release-2.1 [+1/-0/±3] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-522e: [iDempiere] tsvikruha e885152 - IDEMPIERE-2485 Missing OSGi Factory for Replenish Interface
Not-522e: [iDempiere] globalqss 725f962 - IDEMPIERE-2485 Missing OSGi Factory for Replenish Interface / minor - decrease log level
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2485 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed"
Not-522e: [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2485
Not-522e: [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to development [+3/-0/±10] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/
Not-522e: [iDempiere] globalqss cc3ebe4 - hg merge release-2.1 (merge release2.1 into development)

Retrieved from "https://globalqss.com/wiki/index.php?title=IDempiere/FullMeeting20150304&oldid=502"