IDempiere/FullMeeting20150603 - Revision history

CarlosRuiz: drop JIRA notifications from log

2015-06-04T15:11:29Z

drop JIRA notifications from log

CarlosRuiz: full meeting

2015-06-04T15:10:40Z

full meeting

New page

⇐
[[IDempiere|Table of Contents]] |
[[IDempiere/Full Meeting Minutes|Full Meeting Minutes]] |
Full Meeting 2015-06-03


'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Good Morning 
'''''nmicoud''''': Bonjour 
'''''nmicoud''''': Hello CarlosRuiz ; i updloaded a new patch for https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613 ; could you have a look please ? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': sure nmicoud - let me check 
'''''nmicoud''''': thanks 
'''''nmicoud''''': Also, any idea for https://groups.google.com/forum/?nomobile=true#!topic/idempiere/5O424-bIrho and https://groups.google.com/d/msg/idempiere/KhrVfOor3BU/Q36Y1vXyZmcJ ? 
'''''nmicoud''''': With little modification, it would become more user friendly :) 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I think both suggestions are correct 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': the account dialog is very - very - very unfriendly 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': that is a search window - but also create - and to create is not clear - if you push the refresh or reset - and save 
'''''nmicoud''''': do you have other enhacenement in mind 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': maybe as Marco said - it could be remembering user to save before closing 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': in general :-( I think the concept of "combination" is not very clear for users - and this dialog makes it worst 
'''''nmicoud''''': in fact they only want to play with accounts 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': something that annoys me also using that is that the infowindow for the account requires to push the refresh button - doesn't work putting the account value and ENTER - I'm compeled to use the mouse 
'''''nmicoud''''': not sure if it easily feasible as this panel is based on tab 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yep - I think is general of info window 
'''''nmicoud''''': perhaps we should add a specific info window ? 
'''''Deepak_''''': I also want advise, should we change Attribute selection window's show all option to list all ASI involved with product transaction? Currently issue is if you do not have storage locator for that ASI it do not show 
'''''Deepak_''''': This force not to use storage cleanup process 
'''''Deepak_''''': Regarding info window, Should we add editable field support? 
'''''Deepak_''''': not related to account info window 
'''''nmicoud''''': Deepak_ : you mean editable field in the grid ? 
'''''Deepak_''''': yes 
'''''Deepak_''''': same like in adempiere smart browser 
'''''nmicoud''''': I have no use case in mind, but could be a useful feature 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': don't know about smart browser - never tried - what is that used for? an example? 
'''''Deepak_''''': For example, Replenishment info window with user editable entry 
'''''Deepak_''''': So info window suggest qty and user can enter against suggestin 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2613 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] [~nmicoud], I just packed in RV_T_Aging_IDEMPIERE-2361.zip and the field currency disappear after I select the last saved param. 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': but you need something else to process the user changes on grid 
'''''nmicoud''''': Carlos, for #2613 ; you tested it on v3 or 2.1 (I have tested it on 2.1) 
'''''nmicoud''''': i will try again 
'''''nmicoud''''': anyway 
'''''Deepak_''''': Carlos, we have process button for same in info window 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': 2.1 nmicoud 
'''''nmicoud''''': O_o 
'''''nmicoud''''': will try it again 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I see Deepak - it sounds useful 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': about ASI Deepak - I saw you posted that in forums - so is just showing ASI for products with qty in storage? - and you say it must show ASIs that have passed through inventory even if they were already sold? 
'''''Deepak_''''': Currently when we click on show all, it shows ASI with 0 qty on storage too 
'''''Deepak_''''': But if storage is cleaned up then it will not be there 
'''''Deepak_''''': Now say you get some customer returns, or want to do cost adjustment for that ASI, you don't have way to select such ASI 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': storage cleanup is deleting records with zero qty? 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2613 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] [~carlosruiz_globalqss] ; ok tested again and it works ! But here another use case that failed : - remove the display logic form C_Currency_ID - add display logic @DateAcct@ = Y for IsSOTrx Then launch the process, check Account Date and execute Open the report again and select last param. Account Date will be checked but IsSOTrx will remain hidden 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere] dpansheriya 20c11e5 - IDEMPIERE-2626 : Allowing to enter manual ASI on lines while even table is on exclude rule 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2626 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Deepak Pansheriya" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2626 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, reproduced the second case with @DateAcct@ - reviewing 
'''''nmicoud''''': ok 
'''''Deepak_''''': Carlos, yes storage cleanup deletes record with 0 on hand which are updated older then 3 days 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere2.1] jenkins built #229 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere2.1/229/ 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': good Deepak - maybe a flag telling "Show All" - defaulting to show just those in stock 
'''''Deepak_''''': may we can add it on client info or system config 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I think is more user option - after you have a big history (years of serials for example) you must be interested to see historic serials just in a few cases 
'''''aguerra''''': buenos dias everybody!!!! 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi Alejandro 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud created IDEMPIERE-2658 Show bpartner name instead of user name in description of allocations generated from Payment Allocation 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE.2658.patch" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 status set to "Peer Review Queue" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 labels set to "+Patch" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-2658 assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2658 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, seems there was a bug on my previous patch - committing the fix 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere] globalqss f70196d - IDEMPIERE-2613 Process saved params doesn't update Display and ReadOnly Logics 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2613 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2613 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere2.1] jenkins built #230 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere2.1/230/ 
'''''nmicoud''''': CarlosRuiz, thanks for the last commit (on #2613), it works well ! 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': gr8 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede created IDEMPIERE-2659 Client Scheduler - generates report for multiple clients 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2659 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede created IDEMPIERE-2660 Generate Invoice Improvements 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2660 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede updated IDEMPIERE-2660 description set to "we found the following process could be improved well: * filter for product category - generate invoice for a specific category - foods * invoicing - split by salesman - invoice per order customers * generate invoice per order department/location - e.g 10 ship location 100 shipments 10 invoice in period * improve group by options (determine how lines 
'''''Not-832d''''': will be generated - lines orders and ) - group by shipment (actual behaviour) - no grouping - group by orders - group by address - group by shipments " 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2660 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere] sauljabin 342fc13 - IDEMPIERE-2655 Get Context Variable Error in WebService queryData 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2655 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2655 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2653 labels set to "+Patch WebServices" 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2653 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2653 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] wondering if this can be done using the new filter+context variables. if not possible, then I think is better not to hardcode upper but make it configurable. 
'''''Not-832d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2653 
'''''Not-832d''''': [iDempiere2.1] jenkins built #231 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere2.1/231/

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 '''''Deepak_''''': For example, Replenishment info window with user editable entry<br>
 '''''Deepak_''''': So info window suggest qty and user can enter against suggestin<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': but you need something else to process the user changes on grid<br>
 '''''nmicoud''''': Carlos, for #2613 ; you tested it on v3 or 2.1 (I have tested it on 2.1)<br>
@@ Line 53: / Line 50: @@
 '''''Deepak_''''': Now say you get some customer returns, or want to do cost adjustment for that ASI, you don't have way to select such ASI<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': storage cleanup is deleting records with zero qty?<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, reproduced the second case with @DateAcct@ - reviewing<br>
 '''''nmicoud''''': ok<br>
 '''''Deepak_''''': Carlos, yes storage cleanup deletes record with 0 on hand which are updated older then 3 days<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': good Deepak - maybe a flag telling "Show All" - defaulting to show just those in stock<br>
 '''''Deepak_''''': may we can add it on client info or system config<br>
@@ Line 69: / Line 58: @@
 '''''aguerra''''': buenos dias everybody!!!!<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi Alejandro<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, seems there was a bug on my previous patch - committing the fix<br>
 '''''nmicoud''''': CarlosRuiz, thanks for the last commit (on #2613), it works well !<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': gr8 <br>