IDempiere/FullMeeting20150401 - Revision history

CarlosRuiz: drop JIRA notifications from log

2015-04-01T18:04:06Z

drop JIRA notifications from log

CarlosRuiz: full meeting

2015-04-01T18:03:14Z

full meeting

New page

⇐
[[IDempiere|Table of Contents]] |
[[IDempiere/Full Meeting Minutes|Full Meeting Minutes]] |
Full Meeting 2015-04-01


'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Good morning 
'''''nmicoud''''': Bonjour ! 
'''''tbayen''''': Good morning from germany! 
'''''a42niem''''': Guten Tag 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Today I'll be working to make idempiere 3.0 compatible with adempiere 3.8 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': This is the plan: 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - I'm going to integrate all existing plugins into core 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - we need to deprecate the new 2pack 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - I'll try to restore jboss support instead of jetty 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - the tools to create views, foreign keys, indexes must be dropped from idempiere to make it compatible 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - sorry we need to get rid of hazelcast and back to the cache reset for synchronization 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - dropping hazelcast of course mean no more broadcast messaging - but is ok for compatibility 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - we'll be back to the old window layout and drop the tab editor 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - security is not really important - why to solve security issues? I'll try to reintroduce the security holes that are still in adempiere 3.8 to make idempiere more compatible 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': more information about the plan here: 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': http://bit.ly/1GK4q3S 
'''''nmicoud''''': :D 
'''''a42niem''''': haha 
'''''tbayen''''': I wanted this week to port iDempiere to sqlite. Can we intergrate that in your patches? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': :) sure that's good 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': it will have sucess as the mysql port integrated into core 
'''''tbayen''''': Hi druiz , nice to see you ;) 
'''''druiz''''': Guten tag everyone 
'''''deepak_''''': Carlos, Don't scare... 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi deepak_, druiz 
'''''deepak_''''': Carlos, iDempiere webstore confusing on user login. It use somewhere email and some part using username for login 
'''''deepak_''''': It should consistently use email I think with support for multiple BPartner per email 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': webstore must use just email - and it doesn't require a role AFAIR 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': :) deepak_ do I look scared? destroying is easier than creating - so compatibility with 3.8 must not be a big task :D 
'''''hieplq_''''': @CarlosRuiz, i feel confuse and thinking your nick is hacked, until i see your link. it's nice joke 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': :D 
'''''ocurieles''''': Good Morning - Buenos dias a todos 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi Orlando 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': tbayen / druiz - are you interested in the preference window? https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2523?focusedCommentId=21447&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-21447 
'''''tbayen''''': Yes, we talked about that yesterday. We wanted to introduce a new preference. Your approach seems very powerful and extendable. I would like to sponsor the work on that. 
'''''nmicoud''''': CarlosRuiz, could you have a look at https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/idempiere/faz7Cdl6NTo and https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/idempiere/5i2H2kDe5Kk. As I need to implement them, I would like to know if it could be integrated in trunk ? 
'''''norbertbede''''': hi all 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hi norbertbede 
'''''ocurieles''''': @CarlosRuiz are you talking about this : ?? https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1604 
'''''ocurieles''''': hi @norbertbede 
'''''ocurieles''''': hey, i see cheap tickets to europe, when is the conference ? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': AskForAcknowledgment is a good example for user preference - I think that's good - but maybe better as a user preference than adding columns to AD_User 
'''''nmicoud''''': Yep, it could be a good example :) 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': about the LDAP thing - I think the LDAP implementation has a failure in multi-tenant 
'''''nmicoud''''': So i can add the column on the WEMailDialog and the default will be added on the 'new' user preference 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yep sounds good 
'''''aguerra''''': JAJAJAJJA 
'''''aguerra''''': buenos dias a todos!!!! 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi Alejandro 
'''''nmicoud''''': Hi ! 
'''''norbertbede''''': uff. i get confused from adempiere 3.8 introduction but looks me 1st april joke... 
'''''norbertbede''''': hope wel 
'''''aguerra''''': today sounds like a happy day !!! 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': If I recall correctly LDAP is designed as AD_System instead of AD_Client - and that's a flaw for multi-tenant systems 
'''''druiz''''': @CarlosRuiz yes I'm interested in the preference window development. We just need to talk about how do you think is the best way to do it 
'''''nmicoud''''': right Carlos 
'''''nmicoud''''': but note that the LDAP field (as we used it) is not linked to a ldap system 
'''''nmicoud''''': is confusing, i mean, the column should be called "username" 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': we were talking about that recently - and hieplq_ suggested an apache library 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': don't remember the name - to integrate as authenticator 
'''''nmicoud''''': yes, i also remember 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] tbayen created IDEMPIERE-2553 enter amounts without decimal separator 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2553 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': tbayen, druiz, about the preference window 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': so, you think creating a table+window is a good idea? 
'''''tbayen''''': Yes, I think so. But the look and feel of the old solution is good. After the change it should feel the same. Just one button more to open a window to configure it. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I thought that we can keep showing in the preference window the fields marked as quick entry 
'''''hieplq_''''': i think add a column to say what's fields is at quick entry. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': it already exists hieplq 
'''''hieplq''''': anyone know reason for why we keep below behavior? in standard window (example sale), do a button action (complete, report) a busy dialog is show but has no mask (user still access to field in window) 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': could be dangerous if you can change a value when completing 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud created IDEMPIERE-2554 Mail : add acknowledgement of receipt 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2554 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': old same discussion here 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': https://groups.google.com/d/msg/idempiere/z1lq_6PCnow/JzpWe6rWElAJ 
'''''tbayen''''': If anybody is interested: We are working to improve the iuimobile interface. We found some flaws and improved some things already. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': keep in sync with egil - he also fixed three bugs recently 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': https://bitbucket.org/egil0902/org.idempiere.iuimobile/commits/all 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I saw three problems with the iuimobile 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': * not compatible with role access all orgs 
'''''tbayen''''': Yes, we included egils work. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': * it doesn't show the logo configured for zkwebui via sysconfig 
'''''druiz''''': @CarlosRuiz Idk if you're saying this, create a new "Preference for" option like user and then see how and where we get those preferences? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': * there are many resultset and preparedstatement close that must be moved to finally block 
'''''aguerra''''': @tbayen look that this ..https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=idempieremobile.beautygroup.ghintech.com.beautygroup 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': druiz, in the group link maybe is better explained 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': https://groups.google.com/d/msg/idempiere/z1lq_6PCnow/JzpWe6rWElAJ 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': more direct https://groups.google.com/d/msg/idempiere/z1lq_6PCnow/cDtBMvec0q4J 
'''''druiz''''': :D ok looks good. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': as I see changes required at 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Login.loadPreferences 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': WPreference to show the fields marked as quick entry and add a link to open the new window 
'''''red1''''': I am standing for elections in ADempiere. Happy April Fool's Day. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': :DDDD 
'''''red1''''': That's why I am here in Munich 
'''''red1''''': Tomorrow I head to my Eagle's Nest in Austria. 
'''''red1''''': My General Dietmar is ready with 3 tanks 
'''''druiz''''': @CarlosRuiz Sure, that sounds good, how do you want to do it and when would you like to start? :D 
'''''HansR42a''''': 2 Issues with BOMDrop.java have been solved (sorting and scrolling) 
'''''HansR42a''''': Hi Red1 
'''''HansR42a''''': Hope weather is better than yesterday in Munich 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': druiz, starting point must be to open a JIRA ticket 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': and attach a patch to it 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': in the ticket copy the comments from the forum 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, how's the feedback of experimental server? 
'''''egil0902''''': good morning 
'''''aguerra''''': hi egil 
'''''tbayen''''': Hi egil0902 
'''''egil0902''''': hi @aguerra 
'''''egil0902''''': hello @tbayen 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi Eduardo 
'''''tbayen''''': We are working on iuimobile and improved some things. Thanks for your last contributions. I hope we can make it even better. :-) 
'''''red1''''': Hi HansR42a 
'''''red1''''': Trains still out 
'''''red1''''': But free taxis given 
'''''egil0902''''': excelente. yesterday i put the image in attachment in the search of products 
'''''egil0902''''': hi @CarlosRuiz i did not see you 
'''''nmicoud''''': Hi egil0902, did you have time to review the multi-charge payment ? 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss created IDEMPIERE-2555 Fact Reconciliation statement leak 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2555 
'''''hieplq''''': @CarlosRuiz, about experimental, see no error in log, hope @norbertbede and @ocurieles maybe help with more test 
'''''Not-311d''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-311d''''': [iDempiere] globalqss acf276e - IDEMPIERE-2555 Fact Reconciliation statement leak 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2555 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2555 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, what would be the recommended tests? 
'''''norbertbede''''': sure 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I guess must be something like: 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - run reports defining a print format - type and summary flag 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': - from menu and from buttons 
'''''egil0902''''': hi nmicoud 
'''''hieplq''''': i think need test relate: save parameter, and message after run a process from dialog 
'''''egil0902''''': i did not know it was ready 
'''''nmicoud''''': i made a first version last week 
'''''nmicoud''''': and commit fixes 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] HansR42a updated IDEMPIERE-2546 Attachment set to "BOMDrop_EnableScrolling.patch" 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2546 
'''''nmicoud''''': https://bitbucket.org/nmicoud/idempiere_paymentmulticharge 
'''''red1''''': Hi eg 
'''''red1''''': Hi egil0902 
'''''egil0902''''': hi red1 
'''''egil0902''''': nmicoud i am going to check this an tell you 
'''''nmicoud''''': thanks 
'''''hieplq''''': @CarlosRuiz. relate leak resource, i has patch at IDEMPIERE-2544, please consider to review 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': that's a patch to help discover leaks? 
'''''hieplq''''': @CarlosRuiz. no, it's patch for fix leak. 
'''''hieplq''''': somewhere isn't a leak but make eclipse warning, 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I don't see the leak on ColumnEncryption 
'''''hieplq''''': yes. it's where not leak, but eclipse make warning 
'''''hieplq''''': i think it's limit of eclipse. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes - lots of warnings - better to configure eclipse to not show those warnings 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': mixed refactoring and fixes on the same commit - hard to review 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': the leaks are critical issues to solve - the warnings are minor that can be workarounded in eclipse 
'''''hieplq''''': ok. will separate it. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': in principle I would not spend too much time solving those false warnings - seems like an eclipse bug 
'''''hieplq''''': configuration hide this warning will hide also warning about true leak 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': so, we need a more potent tool to discover leaks - I think we tried in past with findbugs 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': don't remember if those are more helpful 
'''''hieplq''''': yes. in past i also use findbug. try install in new eclipse but not success. 
'''''hieplq''''': ok. will separate my patch and notify you late. 
'''''hieplq''''': has some other true leak. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': more people suffering from the same 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11291837/eclipse-4-2-resource-leak-through-separate-close-method 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16986131/is-this-a-resource-leak-or-a-false-positive 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': good catch on the FactReconcile 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I didn't notice the fix was on your patch too - as it was mixed 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': but also I fixed a little the indentation - worst indentation to know if the finally was closing the try :D 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] d_ruiz created IDEMPIERE-2556 User preferences window configurable 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2556 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, on the script 201502041515_IDEMPIERE-2389.sql from Deepak - I see in postgresql is creating one element that is not on oracle 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': meaning oracle will throw error on migration script 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': those errors are caught by the jenkins daily installer task - but I didn't setup a daily installer for experimental - maybe is worthy 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, I committed the fix on experimental 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere-experimental/commits/abc0c8b 
'''''hieplq''''': @CarlosRuiz, thanks. 
'''''hieplq''''': about your feedback, [20:51] <CarlosRuiz> could be dangerous if you can change a value when completing 
'''''hieplq''''': you mean it's need fix. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': is it possible? to change the value of a field when completing is running? 
'''''hieplq''''': to redo, just complete a document. fisrt has a mask but after, no mask 
'''''hieplq''''': not sure because i not yet test change value, but it's not standard. for long job, need a mask 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yep - probably is good to protect the fields in such case 
'''''nmicoud''''': If you have time CarlosRuiz, could you have a look at https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2235 (change print format name) ? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, about the disposition of the new fields on process parameter? r u going to work on that? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': ok nmicoud 
'''''nmicoud''''': thanks, 
'''''nmicoud''''': gtg , cu 
'''''hieplq''''': yes. 
'''''egil0902''''': tbayen you know i was really testing iuimobile interface and i always have a problem because of the comparison with webui erp interface and all of the functionalities that have it 
'''''egil0902''''': and i was doing some test 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, in experimental running at this moment accounting fact daily - login in english 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': is showing 1000001 instead of print format name 
'''''egil0902''''': modifying theme and some other things to let web ui be posible in a phone 
'''''hieplq''''': huh. i can't redo in my side. 
'''''egil0902''''': and seems to be posible. What are your coments about this? 
'''''hieplq''''': i has capture my screen 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': can you try at this moment? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': https://experimental.idempiere.org/webui/index.zul 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': got it 
'''''egil0902''''': and any other who have a coment about this ... 
'''''hieplq''''': @CarlosRuiz, it's still good in my side. maybe i give you a teamview session 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': the only difference between your screenshot and mine was the org login 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': try login with Org HQ Warehouse 
'''''hieplq''''': ah. ok will fix it. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': ah / but now is fixed 
'''''hieplq''''': :D 
'''''hieplq''''': hi @egil0902 when i go to your link in play, google said it's not support my country https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=idempieremobile.beautygroup.ghintech.com.beautygroup 
'''''egil0902''''': hi hieplq 
'''''egil0902''''': i am doing this with a paramater to publis for every body 
'''''hieplq''''': thanks. waiting :D 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': egil0902, is that an android app? it doesn't run in browser? 
'''''egil0902''''': this link is for a client who have the iuimobile for their customers and is show like a app in play store 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, just tested with language and it worked fine 
'''''egil0902''''': CarlosRuiz i just make an iframe in android app to show by default the client link to the iuimobile 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': good 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, tested financial report in my little screen and the parameters can't be seen 
'''''egil0902''''': but it is realy nice and looks like an app 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': the summary flag cannot be changed as it out of the window 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': things are working fine there hieplq - do you think to integrate to core or wait for the change of field layout? 
'''''druiz''''': eduardo 
'''''druiz''''': @egil0902 I just install a clean version of your fork for the mobile and it doesn't work, some errors in the imports in the MANIFEST file 
'''''egil0902''''': what version of idempiere are you using? 
'''''druiz''''': development 
'''''egil0902''''': my iuimobile version works until 2.1 version of idempiere 
'''''druiz''''': oh ok maybe that's why 
'''''egil0902''''': red1 take what i did and publis the 3.0 version 
'''''egil0902''''': As stated, it is made for latest iDempiere 3.0 only. Older plugins in https://sourceforge.net/projects/red1/files/p2/Mobile/ will work with 2.1. I made this 3.0 upgrade because of the new jetty which breaks any older UI (HTTPContext and JSP servlet) calls. The new one is much simpler and lighter. (Later i will study Eduardo Gil's improvement and incorporate them). 
'''''egil0902''''': that is what red1 publish 
'''''druiz''''': Oh ok, but you've made some commits of good things that I wanted to have :D 
'''''egil0902''''': you know i think this pluging development sould be order in just one repository to have the standard with all of the functionality 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2235 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-2235_v3.patch" 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] Hi [~nmicoud] the change on PO were rejected when integrating with development. I made a different change to PO achieving the same as you were trying, but the list on wizard and on the print format box on window are not changed. 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2235 
'''''hieplq''''': @tbayen, maybe you can install this editor to our wiki? 
'''''hieplq''''': https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor:Test?veaction=edit 
'''''hieplq''''': Hi @CarlosRuiz. it's great to integrate experimental to core. it will help me continue some pending issue. 
'''''hieplq''''': about layout @norbertbede confirm will soon. 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': Hello everyone 
'''''norbertbede''''': sure as i promise layout could be done this week 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hola Vyrlokar 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': Hola Carlos 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': CarlosRuiz, Should I speak in Spanish or in English? I'm a native Spanish speaker, but I usually restrict myself to English online unless I know everyone in the audience speaks Spanish, out of respect 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': sure - today's idempiere meeting day - so better in english 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': Oh, am I interrupting anything? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': no - please go ahead 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': I'm trying to build a test module for iDempiere, I've got the environment setup, downloaded the sources, built them, imported the database, and ran the sync applied script. I made a new table as a test, and exported it to a 2Pack.zip. The 2Pack works if I login as system admin and import it, but I can't get the idempiereActivator to import it. it just activated the plugin when I type "start n" on the iDempiere console on the swing c 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': lient (launched through Eclipse). 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': but it shows no message that it is installing the 2Pack 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I think that's intended for the zk client - haven't tested if swing launch activator and install 2pack 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': Ah, thank you Carlos 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': Is the swing client deprecated? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': no, is kept working, but not evolving 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': almost nobody here uses that 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': so you won't find too much support for swing client - we just try to not break it - to keep it working as some people are used to it 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': but most of the big improvements that we have done for zk are not implemented on swing / and probably won't - seems there are not enough community interest on that 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': sorry - "there is not" :) 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2548 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2548 
'''''Not-311d''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.1 [+2/-0/±0] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-311d''''': [iDempiere] globalqss 9d5cb8e - IDEMPIERE-2548 Misspelling in Unit of Measure Type 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': CarlosRuiz, Another thing, when I installed iDempiere, and imported the database seed, I ran the sync applied shell script, and looking at it, found here (re-stuff/raw/tip/script_to_sync_db/syncApplied.sh). I see that it only runs the scripts from the 2.1 directories, but the database seems way older than that. Should I run the scripts from 1.0a to 2.1? from ADempiere versions? 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-2547 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] Thanks [~deepak], tried to integrate into development or 2.1 and failed, there was a rejection in queryData as it doesn't match current code. 
'''''Not-311d''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-2547 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': there are no entries in the migration scripts table of the seed database 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Vyrlokar, where did you download the installer? 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': CarlosRuiz, I ran hg clone and built it myself 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': so - the seed must have the 2.1 version 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': as detailed in http://www.globalqss.com/wiki/index.php/IDempiere 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': you can check the version in table AD_System 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': CarlosRuiz, Ok, I was puzzled by the fact that the migration table starts with no entries 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': I expected it to contain entries for the 1.0a to 2.1 scripts 
'''''Not-311d''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to development [+2/-0/±2] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-311d''''': [iDempiere] globalqss 12c7c61 - hg merge release-2.1 (merge release2.1 into development) 
'''''Vyrlokar''''': Cya everybody

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': don't remember the name - to integrate as authenticator<br>
 '''''nmicoud''''': yes, i also remember<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': tbayen, druiz, about the preference window<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': so, you think creating a table+window is a good idea?<br>
@@ Line 78: / Line 76: @@
 '''''hieplq''''': anyone know reason for why we keep below behavior? in standard window (example sale), do a button action (complete, report) a busy dialog is show but has no mask (user still access to field in window)<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': could be dangerous if you can change a value when completing<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': old same discussion here<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': https://groups.google.com/d/msg/idempiere/z1lq_6PCnow/JzpWe6rWElAJ<br>
@@ Line 125: / Line 121: @@
 '''''egil0902''''': hi @CarlosRuiz i did not see you<br>
 '''''nmicoud''''': Hi egil0902, did you have time to review the multi-charge payment ?<br>
 '''''hieplq''''': @CarlosRuiz, about experimental, see no error in log, hope @norbertbede and @ocurieles maybe help with more test<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, what would be the recommended tests?<br>
 '''''norbertbede''''': sure<br>
@@ Line 142: / Line 132: @@
 '''''nmicoud''''': i made a first version last week<br>
 '''''nmicoud''''': and commit fixes<br>
 '''''nmicoud''''': https://bitbucket.org/nmicoud/idempiere_paymentmulticharge<br>
 '''''red1''''': Hi eg<br>
@@ Line 174: / Line 162: @@
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': I didn't notice the fix was on your patch too - as it was mixed<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': but also I fixed a little the indentation - worst indentation to know if the finally was closing the try  :D<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': hieplq, on the script 201502041515_IDEMPIERE-2389.sql from Deepak - I see in postgresql is creating one element that is not on oracle<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': meaning oracle will throw error on migration script<br>
@@ Line 236: / Line 222: @@
 '''''druiz''''': Oh ok, but you've made some commits of good things that I wanted to have  :D<br>
 '''''egil0902''''': you know i think this pluging development sould be order in just one repository to have the standard with all of the functionality<br>
 '''''hieplq''''': @tbayen, maybe you can install this editor to our wiki?<br>
 '''''hieplq''''': https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/VisualEditor:Test?veaction=edit<br>
@@ Line 262: / Line 245: @@
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': but most of the big improvements that we have done for zk are not implemented on swing / and probably won't - seems there are not enough community interest on that<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': sorry - "there is not"   :)<br>
 '''''Vyrlokar''''': CarlosRuiz, Another thing, when I installed iDempiere, and imported the database seed, I ran the sync applied shell script, and looking at it, found here (re-stuff/raw/tip/script_to_sync_db/syncApplied.sh). I see that it only runs the scripts from the 2.1 directories, but the database seems way older than that. Should I run the scripts from 1.0a to 2.1? from ADempiere versions?<br>
 '''''Vyrlokar''''': there are no entries in the migration scripts table of the seed database<br>
 '''''CarlosRuiz''''': Vyrlokar, where did you download the installer?<br>
@@ Line 278: / Line 254: @@
 '''''Vyrlokar''''': CarlosRuiz, Ok, I was puzzled by the fact that the migration table starts with no entries<br>
 '''''Vyrlokar''''': I expected it to contain entries for the 1.0a to 2.1 scripts<br>
 '''''Vyrlokar''''': Cya everybody<br>