CarlosRuiz: full meeting

2013-12-12T00:27:58Z

full meeting

New page

⇐
[[IDempiere|Table of Contents]] |
[[IDempiere/Full Meeting Minutes|Full Meeting Minutes]] |
Full Meeting 2013-12-11


'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Good Morning 
'''''nmicoud''''': Bonjour 
'''''tbayen''''': Hi 
'''''tbayen''''': Daarestiet 
'''''red1''''': Hola 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I'll be integrating things from the peer review queue 
'''''a42niem''''': Guten Tag 
'''''nmicoud''''': tbayen: do you think you'll have time to review https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1395 ? otherwise, i could put it directly in the peer review queue 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I tested yesterday the attachment scanner plugin - it's working fine - I sent the author patch to work with java6 
'''''aguerra''''': Good Morning everybody!!! 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi Alejandro 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud created IDEMPIERE-1623 MAIL_SEND_BCC_TO_FROM is not used 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1623 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1623 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-1623.patch" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1623 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1623 assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1623 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1623 status set to "Peer Review Queue" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1623 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1623 labels set to "+Patch" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1623 
'''''tbayen''''': nmicoud, I will find time to review it. I prefer to first review it inside the "Swing User Community" before giving it to Carlos. 
'''''nmicoud''''': cool, that's the goal :) ; thanks 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, why is that needed? by default all tabs are now in single row - having a tab in multi-row is because of a user pref - or a window customization 
'''''nmicoud''''': you can be in multi-row view to search a record ; you don't find it and want to create. So click on New and you switch to single mode automatically 
'''''nmicoud''''': it's useful for swing, less for zk 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': ah - nice catch on IDEMPIERE-1623 (a ; at the end of an if) 
'''''nmicoud''''': yep :D 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': supposedly findbugs catch that - don't know if we missed it - or findbugs didn't 
'''''nmicoud''''': i've try lots of time before going in the code ;) 
'''''nmicoud''''': and it fits my needs now ! 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes - findbugs report that line with pattern UCF_USELESS_CONTROL_FLOW_NEXT_LINE 
'''''nmicoud''''': i have findbugs in my eclipse and it does not report anything about this 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': it reported to me this one http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/bugDescriptions.html#UCF_USELESS_CONTROL_FLOW_NEXT_LINE 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': checked all code and seems like is the only one 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': there is a strange construction on line 84 of ExpenseTypesFromAccounts 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': but is more an indentation and readability issue 
'''''nmicoud''''': ctrl+i ;) 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 4 commits to release-1.0c [+2/-0/±4] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] elainetan 90590db - IDEMPIERE-1621 Mandatory field in process parameter panel not in red label 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss ad59443 - IDEMPIERE-1587 Error ORA-12704 for some columns 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss b4967e0 - IDEMPIERE-1575 Increase some columns length / based on patch from Nicolas Micoud (nmicoud) 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] nmicoud d90291f - IDEMPIERE-1623 MAIL_SEND_BCC_TO_FROM is not used 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1621 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Elaine Tan" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1621 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1587 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1587 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1575 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Nicolas Micoud" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1575 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1623 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Nicolas Micoud" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1623 
'''''nmicoud''''': CarlosRuiz: About https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/idempiere/nMMyoZS_td4 (Restrict access to dashboard by role) ; do you think it is feasable in sql ? 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-1.0c [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss 3605d0e - minor - improve readability of ExpenseTypesFromAccounts 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, maybe an "AND NOT IN" 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': on the second part of the query 
'''''nmicoud''''': will try this 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': about the question raised from Kevin at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/idempiere/Alryi_jLclA/rnBlrfl2uUcJ 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': do you think we must allow non-FOSS plugins to be published in our wiki? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': tbayen, nmicoud - have you tested IDEMPIERE-1605 ? 
'''''nmicoud''''': not yet, but i can 
'''''nmicoud''''': seems ok 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': if the SMT wants it (and it doesn't affect zk or core like this case) just let me know and I'll push it 
'''''nmicoud''''': it seems useful, so +1 for me ; tbayen WDYT ? 
'''''tbayen''''': It looks useful but I did not test it yet. If you think it is ok I agree to integrate it. 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud created IDEMPIERE-1624 Restrict access to System dashboards 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1624 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1624 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-1624.patch" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] Here's a modified sql with a new 'AND NOT IN' clause to remove the inactive records. Wondering if a new checkbox (something like 'IsAuthorized') wouldn't be better than the IsActive flag. WDYT ? Regards, Nicolas 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1624 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1624 status set to "Peer Review Queue" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1624 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1624 assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1624 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] nmicoud updated IDEMPIERE-1624 labels set to "+Patch" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1624 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss created IDEMPIERE-1625 Remittance is printing inactive address 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1625 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-1.0c [+2/-0/±2] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss 7ce954a - IDEMPIERE-1625 Remittance is printing inactive address 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1625 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1625 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nmicoud, 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': nevermind - testing your patch for 1624 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.0 [+0/-0/±2] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': Good morning to every one. 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss c844743 - IDEMPIERE-1624 Restrict access to System dashboards / based on patch from Nicolas Micoud (nmicoud) 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1624 status set to "Resolved" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1624 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi Eduardo 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': I carlos i need to ask you something 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': i have a customer who want in the subject of the request mail the name of the bussiness partner 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': can i do this whitout a plugin? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': have you tried @Name@ ? 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': no. 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': but in the subjet i can add this. I could doit on the body adding by default @Name@ in the sumary 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': Efectively it works but in the body. if i want to add this in the subject where sould i put this? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': doesn't work in the subject? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I mean subject on mail template 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': ok i am going to test it 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-1.0c [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] dantam 6b9e5f0 - IDEMPIERE-1605 - Save path when working with attachments. 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1605 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Daniel Tamm" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1605 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1604 labels set to "" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1604 
'''''bhoot''''': Any iDempiere/Adempiere trainer out there? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I can go to India if you want :-) 
'''''bhoot''''': you are welcome. 
'''''tbayen''''': I had a training with Carlos this spring and can recommend him. You will not find anyone better. 
'''''tbayen''''': :-) 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': :-) thanks for the feedback - maybe we can do similar - next conference in India 
'''''bhoot''''': That is good idea. 
'''''bhoot''''': I am looking for basic training over teamviewer and willing to pay. I don't want to spend time asking silly questions on forum and irc. 
'''''tbayen''''': If there is a conference the trainers will like more to come. I would come too for this. Hehe :-) 
'''''tbayen''''': But I can only give a training together with Carlos if there is Karaoke in the city. Haha! 
'''''bhoot''''': I don't know the number of iD/AD users in india. So don't know if a conference can be organized. 
'''''tbayen''''': I thought the same last year. In the Krefeld conference mostly people from all over the world came. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': iDempiere Karaoke is an institution 
'''''tbayen''''': The first step was to commit the main developers. The others came from alone... And if they would not have come it would have been a success either because the main developers were in one room and could meet. 
'''''tbayen''''': Are walking tree working with iDempiere or are still stucked on ADempiere? They are from india too. 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I think really there are LOTS of *mpiere users and developers in India - just they are not so active in forums 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I could visit Deepak 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes - walking tree is hired as release manager for Adempiere - so, they can join 
'''''aguerra''''': Hola Eduardo!!!! 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': hola alejandro 
'''''egil_ghintech''''': resolviste lo del csv? 
'''''aguerra''''': yeah!!!! 
'''''aguerra''''': listo!!! subi 250 registros. 
'''''aguerra''''': nmicoud, "NF1.0 Document Sequence Improved", nice contributions!!! THK 
'''''nmicoud''''': yeah! it rocks ! ;) 
'''''nmicoud''''': carlos did a good part of the job 
'''''aguerra''''': .... ups .. CarlosRuiz, excelente contribucion.... Gracias!!!! 
'''''nmicoud''''': it was a Colombian/French enhancement :) 
'''''nmicoud''''': gtg ; see you 
'''''aguerra''''': I am new but I hope to make contributions soon ! 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1588 Attachment set to "IDEMPIERE-1588_v2.patch" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] Nicolas, peer reviewed your patch, I think it's breaking paymentterm function and also any view/report using the original nextBusinessDay. I would suggest better IDEMPIERE-1588_v2.patch - less disruptive. Could you please test it and provide feedback? Regards, Carlos Ruiz 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1588 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1588 assignee set to "Nicolas Micoud" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1588 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] juan.arboleda updated IDEMPIERE-1597 assignee set to "Juan David Arboleda Ruiz" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1597 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlos.augusto updated IDEMPIERE-1574 Attachment set to "20131211_IDEMPIERE-1574_NULL_CONTROL.patch" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1574 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlos.augusto updated IDEMPIERE-1574 assignee set to "Carlos Antonio Ruiz Gomez" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1574 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 2 commits to release-1.0c [+0/-0/±4] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] j2garcia b271610 - IDEMPIERE-1516 Performance indicators display fails when role user assigment inactive 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] caaugustoss 46ac4a4 - IDEMPIERE-1574 Sales Order Line lets Price under the Price Limit when updating / fix NPE 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1516 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Jesus Garcia" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1516 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] tbayen updated IDEMPIERE-1618 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] To part 1 (caused probably by new Eclipse version): For completelyness (and googling people) I give the whole error I got in the log (or on console with my patch) here. My workaround is to delete $HOME/buckminster.output/* and then retry. This seems to solve this issue (but after two weeks of trying I do not believe anything about this). {noformat} org.eclipse.m2e.logback.configuration: The org.eclipse.m2e.logback.configuration bundle was 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1618 
'''''tbayen''''': CarlosRuiz, what do you think about my patch in IDEMPIERE-1618? Is is worth to do it also for the server script and submit as a patch? Or shall we just close the issue and let people find out themself to look into the log? 
'''''tbayen''''': (I speak of the thing I call "Part 2" in the issue comments) 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes - I think is worthy 
'''''tbayen''''': ok, I will do it. 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.0 [+0/-0/±2] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss df90d4b - IDEMPIERE-1558 Performance indicators display fails using context variables in measure calculation / based on patch from Jesus Garcia (j2garcia) 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1558 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Jesus Garcia" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1558 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] tbayen updated IDEMPIERE-1490 labels set to "+Patch report" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1490 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.0 [+3/-0/±0] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss 8519175 - IDEMPIERE-1521 Ability to delete a view within AD / based on patch from Nicolas Micoud (nmicoud) 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-1521 status set to "Resolved" -assignee set to "Nicolas Micoud" -resolution set to "Fixed" 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1521 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.0 [+2/-0/±0] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss 801c4d1 - IDEMPIERE-1132 Generate official dictionary indexes 
'''''bhoot''''': is it possible to create table in database using Application Dictionary or table needs to be created first? 
'''''bhoot''''': I know how to create Application Dictionary from table existing in db. But is otherway around possible? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes, you can also create the table in DB and with a button read it and the process creates the entries in dictionary 
'''''bhoot''''': My question is if I make entry in to dictionary first , can application create table in db? 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': yes - tbayen answered that yesterday - the synchronize column button 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': both ways are supported 
'''''bhoot''''': ok thanks I have to find that button... 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': http://wiki.idempiere.org/en/Table_and_Column_(Window_ID-100)#TAB:_Column 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': button at bottom 
'''''banym''''': CarlosRuiz, do you prefer the sun/oracle jdk or does idempiere run full functional with openjdk aswell? 
'''''norbertbede''''': hi community 
'''''norbertbede''''': looking stakeholders to issue https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1606?filter=-2 
'''''norbertbede''''': hops 
'''''norbertbede''''': https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1606 
'''''norbertbede''''': looks me serious issue. i tested it deeply, well 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': banym, I haven't tested with sun/oracle - just openjdk 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': Hi norbertbede 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I have noticed that after you run the hash password process - you need to restart the server 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': did you? 
'''''norbertbede''''': yes sure. 
'''''norbertbede''''': i consult it also with my java guy try to fix issues inside my ticket, but too deep level for us... 
'''''norbertbede''''': i have reported 3 issues becase relate each other 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': when using email for login - I think first step after initial client setup is that SuperUser must assign an email to the two new users 
'''''norbertbede''''': if you deploy client manually then yes its working 
'''''norbertbede''''': we want save time and deploy client by external web form trough API 
'''''norbertbede''''': in that case that is not works 
'''''norbertbede''''': so proces is stalled 
'''''norbertbede''''': that is the reason why i classify it as improvement not bug 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': calling web services I guess - in such case you can update the emails also via webservices 
'''''norbertbede''''': so you suggest to add client email as superuser email ? 
'''''norbertbede''''': let say that is acceptable 
'''''norbertbede''''': in issue 2 BUG: Initial Client Setup Process - doesn’t hash passwords for Client Admin and Client User 
'''''norbertbede''''': password field encryption setting up but value after client setup password same as name - but no hashed 
'''''norbertbede''''': so cant login 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': ah 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': that's a bug - the value is being inserted directly 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': MSetup.java - lines 285, 308 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I would think the Initial Setup must be improved to ask for emails instead of names when the system is using emails to login - and fix that bug on the password if the system is using hashed 
'''''norbertbede''''': can you fix this bug ?pls 
'''''norbertbede''''': issue 3 in ticket bug too, altough rare 
'''''norbertbede''''': ly happend 
'''''norbertbede''''': but idea to improve initial client is good point, because then follow system wide rule 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': I think that bug will be in queue - is not blocker as it has a workaround to finish the setup with SuperUser 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': or if you want we can guide your java guy about how to solve it 
'''''norbertbede''''': we invest 1 day, want to contribute fix, but was too deep. 
'''''norbertbede''''': maybe he should try it again…and ask 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': we have solved more complex problems on some IRC meetings :-) 
'''''CarlosRuiz''''': the good on IRC meetings is that you have cooperative work with others pointing to the exact line and suggesting ways to solve it 
'''''norbertbede''''': its no question. i was at university in chech today dealing about get new contributors from Masaryk university 
'''''norbertbede''''': hehe ;) 
'''''norbertbede''''': anyway i sent you a private email today. maybe explain our feature steps 
'''''norbertbede''''': so in some weeks we will have - more complex - issues too ;) 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] norbert.bede updated IDEMPIERE-1606 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] hi community looking stakeholders to issue https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1606?filter=-2 hops https://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1606 looks me serious issue. i tested it deeply, well 22:29 CarlosRuiz banym, I haven't tested with sun/oracle - just openjdk 22:29 CarlosRuiz Hi norbertbede 22:30 CarlosRuiz I have noticed that after you run the hash password process - you need to restart the server did you? 22:31 
'''''Not-002''''': [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-1606 
'''''norbertbede''''': i have updated issue by chat... 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-2.0 [+2/-0/±0] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss d951d89 - IDEMPIERE-1132 Generate official foreign keys 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 2 commits to development [+11/-0/±16] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss b43fe00 - hg merge release-1.0c (merge release1 into release2) 
'''''Not-002''''': [iDempiere] globalqss 52646e1 - hg merge release-2.0 (merge release2 into development)

IDempiere/FullMeeting20131211 - Revision history

CarlosRuiz: drop JIRA notifications from log

CarlosRuiz: full meeting