| Not-d2d2 | [iDempiere3.1Daily] jenkins built #33 completed (failure) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere3.1Daily/33/ | 05:31 |
|---|---|---|
| *** nmicoud has joined #idempiere | 06:50 | |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] hieplq created IDEMPIERE-3036 window block (no way to continue) when a mandatory field load a value that user don't have right | 07:13 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-3036 | 07:13 |
| *** nmicoud has quit IRC | 07:28 | |
| *** jannis_a42 has joined #idempiere | 08:37 | |
| *** jannis_a421 has quit IRC | 08:39 | |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] hieplq updated IDEMPIERE-3036 | 08:44 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] reason by 2672 add access right to direct query, | 08:44 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-3036 | 08:44 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] hieplq updated IDEMPIERE-3036 description set to "step to redo: 1. login by role "garden user" 2. create a invoice document. selection "AP CreditMemo" for "Target Document Type" 3. log out and login with role "garden admin". 4. add record access right to "AP CreditMemo" let "garden user" exclusive to "AP CreditMemo" 5. relog in with role "garden user" 6. open invoice is created at step 2 7. window will | 08:45 |
| Not-d2d2 | stay with editing state, and value of "Target Document Type" not yet load. now user have to change value of "Target Document Type", other he can't move to other record by anyway." | 08:45 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-3036 | 08:45 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-3036 | 12:11 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] [~hieplq] - followed same steps and cannot reproduce it in my local 3.1 | 12:11 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-3036 | 12:12 |
| *** himalsaman has joined #idempiere | 12:15 | |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-3036 | 12:27 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] ok, now I'm able to reproduce it (don't know what was happening with eclipse) | 12:27 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-3036 | 12:27 |
| Not-d2d2 | [iDempiere] CarlosRuiz_globalqss pushed 1 commit to release-3.1 [+0/-0/±1] https://bitbucket.org/idempiere/idempiere/commits/ | 12:52 |
| Not-d2d2 | [iDempiere] globalqss ca794b9 - IDEMPIERE-1328 Change tab name dynamically / fix issue not refreshing tab name on update | 12:52 |
| Not-d2d2 | [iDempiere3.1] jenkins built #54 completed (success) http://ci.idempiere.org/job/iDempiere3.1/54/ | 13:19 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] hieplq updated IDEMPIERE-3036 | 13:20 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] thanks for consider [~carlosruiz_globalqss]. i think it's correct to don't load a protected record. but should have a way for user move to other record. i thinking about bellow solution: still load protected record, but just show text "can't see" replace for real value. so record don't show in edit mode and still protect record. | 13:20 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-3036 | 13:20 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] carlosruiz_globalqss updated IDEMPIERE-3036 | 13:59 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] yes - was thinking on the same line - ok to not show that info - but very bad that the user is locked there. IDEMPIERE-2672 fixed a security issue when a user was able to set a preference with an ID (on Preference window) out of the client and see info about that record - the case would be similar, if you exclude the record and the user can set a preference to the excluded record would be able to use it. | 13:59 |
| Not-d2d2 | So, I think same as you - IDEMPIERE-2672 is ok - locking the user there is bad. | 13:59 |
| Not-d2d2 | [IDEMPIERE] http://idempiere.atlassian.net/browse/IDEMPIERE-3036 | 13:59 |
| *** nmicoud has joined #idempiere | 20:00 | |
| *** nmicoud has quit IRC | 22:04 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!